XHTML Rules, OK?
This morning something made me let out a world-weary, Napoleon-Dynamite-type sigh: another well-meaning article recommending developers use HTML.
Every now and then a technical purist analyses the current situation and announces that XHTML cannot be used fully and so HTML is the way to go. They’re correct… and very, very wrong.
You see, they’re thinking in terms of what seems most ‘pure’ to them instead of considering the best path forward for the web and the people who build it. There’s a chaotic, messy, broken world out there that needs stepping stones like XHTML Transitional and text/html.
See last year’s entry about this very same topic for a full explanation, and I’ll stop going on about it. Well, for another year or so, anyway.
Thu 21st Sep 2006, 1:19pm GMT
Filed under: Client-side Coding, Rants and Grumbles, Web
Comments
I do understand the point you were making about the problems caused, but I still think it's best to push transitional XHTML now so that the web (and developers, and web dev software) is in a slightly better position to make use of true XHTML once browser support allows it.
Comments are now closed for this entry.
Matt Round’s company blog, covering web development, media, technology and pretty much anything else.
- Web Sites
- Good-looking, effective, accessible sites.
- Multimedia
- Logos, Flash games, animation and illustration.
- Advice
- Help with strategy, planning and getting noticed.

—
Maciej Stachowiak, 23rd Sep, 1:19am