The Flashy Rodent Dilemma
Last year this site was the neglected one, with a tired old design and infrequent updates; now the situation is pretty much reversed and it’s malevole (my ‘stupid’ weblog) that’s stagnant and uninspiring.
I’ve got a redesign plus several new features planned out, but have dithered over one key decision: whether to switch to a Flash interface.
The temptation is obvious — producing slick, seamless effects and smooth movement is a doddle in Flash. It’d also be interesting to make use of some of the server communication features, play around with interface ideas (including tightly-integrated games), and tackle the usability and accessibility challenges.
But one detail, which may seem relatively minor, really bothers me and currently tips the scales in favour of JavaScript. Like many Firefox users I’m hooked on middle-clicking to open links in a new tab in the background, but there’s no way to support this (and other similar behaviours such as shift-clicking) in a Flash site. As browsers allow buttons to be configured, and Flash can’t reliably associate clicks with page loads anyway (everything’s flexibly scripted), this isn’t going to change in the foreseeable future.
Is this a valid concern, or am I being too picky over what is an intentionally trivial, stupid site? Should I just live with Flash’s inherent limitations and go all-out for a multimedia malevole?
Tue 15th Feb 2005, 11:43pm GMT
Filed under: Accessibility, Client-side Coding, Design, Usability, Web, Weblogs
Comments
It must be like stepping into a hall of mirrors!
Comments are now closed for this entry.
Matt Round’s company blog, covering web development, media, technology and pretty much anything else.
- Web Sites
- Good-looking, effective, accessible sites.
- Multimedia
- Logos, Flash games, animation and illustration.
- Advice
- Help with strategy, planning and getting noticed.

— Dave Beard, 16th Feb, 1:49am